PHP 8.3.4 Released!

Surcharge magique

La surcharge magique en PHP permet de "créer" dynamiquement des propriétés et des méthodes. Ces entités dynamiques sont traitées via des méthodes magiques établies que l'on peut positionner dans une classe pour divers types d'actions.

Les méthodes magiques de surcharge sont appelées lors de l'interaction avec des propriétés ou des méthodes qui n'ont pas été déclarées ou ne sont pas visibles dans le contexte courant. Le reste de cette section utilise les termes de propriétés inaccessibles et de méthodes inaccessibles pour se référer à cette combinaison de déclaration et de visibilité.

Toutes les méthodes magiques de surcharge doivent être définies comme public.

Note:

Aucun des arguments de ces méthodes magiques ne peut être passé par référence.

Note:

L'interprétation PHP de la surcharge est différente de celle de la plupart des langages orientés objet. La surcharge, habituellement, fournit la possibilité d'avoir plusieurs méthodes portant le même nom mais avec une quantité et des types différents d'arguments.

Surcharge de propriétés

public __set(string $name, mixed $value): void
public __get(string $name): mixed
public __isset(string $name): bool
public __unset(string $name): void

__set() est sollicitée lors de l'écriture de données vers des propriétés inaccessibles (protégées ou privées) ou non existante.

__get() est appelée pour lire des données depuis des propriétés inaccessibles (protégées ou privées) ou non existante.

__isset() est sollicitée lorsque isset() ou empty() sont appelées sur des propriétés inaccessibles (protégées ou privées) ou non existante.

__unset() est invoquée lorsque unset() est appelée sur des propriétés inaccessibles (protégées ou privées) ou non existante.

L'argument $name est le nom de la propriété avec laquelle on interagit. L'argument $value de la méthode __set() spécifie la valeur à laquelle la propriété $name devrait être définie.

La surcharge de propriétés ne fonctionne que dans les contextes objets. Ces méthodes magiques ne seront pas lancées en contexte statique. Par conséquent, ces méthodes ne devraient pas être déclarées comme statiques. Un avertissement est levée si une des méthodes magiques est déclarée comme statique.

Note:

La valeur retournée par __set() est ignorée en raison de la façon dont PHP traite l'opérateur d'affectation. De la même façon, __get() n'est jamais appelée lors d'un enchaînement d'affectation, comme ceci :

 $a = $obj->b = 8; 

Note:

PHP n'appellera pas une méthode surchargée à partir de la même méthode surchargée. Cela signifie, par exemple, qu'écrire return $this->foo à l'intérieur de __get() retournera null et lèvera un E_WARNING s'il n'y a pas de propriété foo définie, plutôt que d'appeler __get() une deuxième fois. Toutefois, les méthodes de surcharge peuvent invoquer d'autres méthodes de surcharge de manière implicite (par exemple, __set() déclenchant __get()).

Exemple #1 Exemple de surcharge de propriétés avec les méthodes __get(), __set(), __isset() et __unset()

<?php
class PropertyTest
{
/** Variable pour les données surchargées. */
private $data = array();

/** La surcharge n'est pas utilisée sur les propriétés déclarées. */
public $declared = 1;

/** La surcharge n'est lancée que lorsque l'on accède à cette propriété depuis l'extérieur de la classe. */
private $hidden = 2;

public function
__set($name, $value)
{
echo
"Définition de '$name' à la valeur '$value'\n";
$this->data[$name] = $value;
}

public function
__get($name)
{
echo
"Récupération de '$name'\n";
if (
array_key_exists($name, $this->data)) {
return
$this->data[$name];
}

$trace = debug_backtrace();
trigger_error(
'Propriété non-définie via __get() : ' . $name .
' dans ' . $trace[0]['file'] .
' à la ligne ' . $trace[0]['line'],
E_USER_NOTICE);
return
null;
}

public function
__isset($name)
{
echo
"Est-ce que '$name' est défini ?\n";
return isset(
$this->data[$name]);
}

public function
__unset($name)
{
echo
"Effacement de '$name'\n";
unset(
$this->data[$name]);
}

/** Ce n'est pas une méthode magique, nécessaire ici que pour l'exemple. */
public function getHidden()
{
return
$this->hidden;
}
}


echo
"<pre>\n";

$obj = new PropertyTest;

$obj->a = 1;
echo
$obj->a . "\n\n";

var_dump(isset($obj->a));
unset(
$obj->a);
var_dump(isset($obj->a));
echo
"\n";

echo
$obj->declared . "\n\n";

echo
"Manipulons maintenant la propriété privée nommée 'hidden' :\n";
echo
"'hidden' est visible depuis la classe, donc __get() n'est pas utilisée...\n";
echo
$obj->getHidden() . "\n";
echo
"'hidden' n'est pas visible en dehors de la classe, donc __get() est utilisée...\n";
echo
$obj->hidden . "\n";
?>

L'exemple ci-dessus va afficher :

Définition de 'a' à '1'
Récupération de 'a'
1

Est-ce que 'a' est défini ?
bool(true)
Effacement de 'a'
Est-ce que 'a' est défini ?
bool(false)

1

Manipulons maintenant la propriété privée nommée 'hidden' :
'hidden' est visible depuis la classe, donc __get() n'est pas utilisée...
2
'hidden' n'est pas visible en dehors de la classe, donc __get() est utilisée...
Récupération de 'hidden'


Notice: Propriété non-définie via __get() : hidden dans <file> à la ligne 64 dans <file> à la ligne 28

Surcharge de méthodes

public __call(string $name, array $arguments): mixed
public static __callStatic(string $name, array $arguments): mixed

__call() est appelée lorsque l'on invoque des méthodes inaccessibles dans un contexte objet.

__callStatic() est lancée lorsque l'on invoque des méthodes inaccessibles dans un contexte statique.

L'argument $name est le nom de la méthode appelée. L'argument $arguments est un tableau contenant les paramètres passés à la méthode $name.

Exemple #2 Surcharge de méthodes avec __call() et __callStatic()

<?php
class MethodTest
{
public function
__call($name, $arguments)
{
// Note : la valeur de $name est sensible à la casse.
echo "Appel de la méthode '$name' "
. implode(', ', $arguments). "\n";
}

public static function
__callStatic($name, $arguments)
{
// Note : la valeur de $name est sensible à la casse.
echo "Appel de la méthode statique '$name' "
. implode(', ', $arguments). "\n";
}
}

$obj = new MethodTest;
$obj->runTest('dans un contexte objet');

MethodTest::runTest('dans un contexte static');
?>

L'exemple ci-dessus va afficher :

Appel de la méthode 'runTest' dans un contexte objet
Appel de la méthode statique 'runTest' dans un contexte static
add a note

User Contributed Notes 27 notes

up
360
theaceofthespade at gmail dot com
11 years ago
A word of warning! It may seem obvious, but remember, when deciding whether to use __get, __set, and __call as a way to access the data in your class (as opposed to hard-coding getters and setters), keep in mind that this will prevent any sort of autocomplete, highlighting, or documentation that your ide mite do.

Furthermore, it beyond personal preference when working with other people. Even without an ide, it can be much easier to go through and look at hardcoded member and method definitions in code, than having to sift through code and piece together the method/member names that are assembled in __get and __set.

If you still decide to use __get and __set for everything in your class, be sure to include detailed comments and documenting, so that the people you are working with (or the people who inherit the code from you at a later date) don't have to waste time interpreting your code just to be able to use it.
up
259
Anonymous
7 years ago
First off all, if you read this, please upvote the first comment on this list that states that “overloading” is a bad term for this behaviour. Because it REALLY is a bad name. You’re giving new definition to an already accepted IT-branch terminology.

Second, I concur with all criticism you will read about this functionality. Just as naming it “overloading”, the functionality is also very bad practice. Please don’t use this in a production environment. To be honest, avoid to use it at all. Especially if you are a beginner at PHP. It can make your code react very unexpectedly. In which case you MIGHT be learning invalid coding!

And last, because of __get, __set and __call the following code executes. Which is abnormal behaviour. And can cause a lot of problems/bugs.

<?php

class BadPractice {
// Two real properties
public $DontAllowVariableNameWithTypos = true;
protected
$Number = 0;
// One private method
private function veryPrivateMethod() { }
// And three very magic methods that will make everything look inconsistent
// with all you have ever learned about PHP.
public function __get($n) {}
public function
__set($n, $v) {}
public function
__call($n, $v) {}
}

// Let's see our BadPractice in a production environment!
$UnexpectedBehaviour = new BadPractice;

// No syntax highlighting on most IDE's
$UnexpectedBehaviour->SynTaxHighlighting = false;

// No autocompletion on most IDE's
$UnexpectedBehaviour->AutoCompletion = false;

// Which will lead to problems waiting to happen
$UnexpectedBehaviour->DontAllowVariableNameWithTyphos = false; // see if below

// Get, Set and Call anything you want!
$UnexpectedBehaviour->EveryPosibleMethodCallAllowed(true, 'Why Not?');

// And sure, why not use the most illegal property names you can think off
$UnexpectedBehaviour->{'100%Illegal+Names'} = 'allowed';

// This Very confusing syntax seems to allow access to $Number but because of
// the lowered visibility it goes to __set()
$UnexpectedBehaviour->Number = 10;

// We can SEEM to increment it too! (that's really dynamic! :-) NULL++ LMAO
$UnexpectedBehaviour->Number++;

// this ofcourse outputs NULL (through __get) and not the PERHAPS expected 11
var_dump($UnexpectedBehaviour->Number);

// and sure, private method calls LOOK valid now!
// (this goes to __call, so no fatal error)
$UnexpectedBehaviour->veryPrivateMethod();

// Because the previous was __set to false, next expression is true
// if we didn't had __set, the previous assignment would have failed
// then you would have corrected the typho and this code will not have
// been executed. (This can really be a BIG PAIN)
if ($UnexpectedBehaviour->DontAllowVariableNameWithTypos) {
// if this code block would have deleted a file, or do a deletion on
// a database, you could really be VERY SAD for a long time!
$UnexpectedBehaviour->executeStuffYouDontWantHere(true);
}
?>
up
174
egingell at sisna dot com
16 years ago
Small vocabulary note: This is *not* "overloading", this is "overriding".

Overloading: Declaring a function multiple times with a different set of parameters like this:
<?php

function foo($a) {
return
$a;
}

function
foo($a, $b) {
return
$a + $b;
}

echo
foo(5); // Prints "5"
echo foo(5, 2); // Prints "7"

?>

Overriding: Replacing the parent class's method(s) with a new method by redeclaring it like this:
<?php

class foo {
function new(
$args) {
// Do something.
}
}

class
bar extends foo {
function new(
$args) {
// Do something different.
}
}

?>
up
70
pogregoire##live.fr
7 years ago
It is important to understand that encapsulation can be very easily violated in PHP. for example :
class Object{

}

$Object = new Object();
$Objet->barbarianProperties = 'boom';

var_dump($Objet);// object(Objet)#1 (1) { ["barbarianProperties"]=> string(7) "boom" }

Hence it is possible to add a propertie out form the class definition.
It is then a necessity in order to protect encapsulation to introduce __set() in the class :

class Objet{
public function __set($name,$value){
throw new Exception ('no');
}
}
up
62
Anonymous
8 years ago
Using magic methods, especially __get(), __set(), and __call() will effectively disable autocomplete in most IDEs (eg.: IntelliSense) for the affected classes.

To overcome this inconvenience, use phpDoc to let the IDE know about these magic methods and properties: @method, @property, @property-read, @property-write.

/**
* @property-read name
* @property-read price
*/
class MyClass
{
private $properties = array('name' => 'IceFruit', 'price' => 2.49)

public function __get($name)
{
return $this->properties($name);
}
}
up
15
Ant P.
15 years ago
Be extra careful when using __call(): if you typo a function call somewhere it won't trigger an undefined function error, but get passed to __call() instead, possibly causing all sorts of bizarre side effects.
In versions before 5.3 without __callStatic, static calls to nonexistent functions also fall through to __call!
This caused me hours of confusion, hopefully this comment will save someone else from the same.
up
24
navarr at gtaero dot net
13 years ago
If you want to make it work more naturally for arrays $obj->variable[] etc you'll need to return __get by reference.

<?php
class Variables
{
public function
__construct()
{
if(
session_id() === "")
{
session_start();
}
}
public function
__set($name,$value)
{
$_SESSION["Variables"][$name] = $value;
}
public function &
__get($name)
{
return
$_SESSION["Variables"][$name];
}
public function
__isset($name)
{
return isset(
$_SESSION["Variables"][$name]);
}
}
?>
up
1
turabgarip at gmail dot com
2 years ago
I concur that "overloading" is a wrong term for this functionality. But I disagree that this functionality is completely wrong. You can do "bad practice" with right code too.

For example __call() is very well applicable to external integration implementations which I am using to relay calls to SOAP methods which doesn't need local implementation. So you don't have to write "empty body" functions. Consider the SOAP service you connect has a "stock update" method. All you have to do is passing product code and stock count to SOAP.

<?php

class Inventory {

public
__construct() {
// configure and connect to SOAP service
$this->soap = new SoapClient();
}

public
__call($soapMethod, $params) {
$this->soap->{$soapMethod}(params);
}
}

// Now you can use any SOAP method without needing a wrapper
$stock = new Inventory();
$stock->updatePrice($product_id, 20);
$stock->saveProduct($product_info);

?>

Of course you'd need a parameter mapping but it's in my honest opinion a lot better then having a plenty of mirror methods like:

<?php

class Inventory {

public function
updateStock($product_id, $stock) {
$soapClient->updateStock($product_id, $stock;
}
public function
updatePrice($product_id, $price) {
$soapClient->updateStock($product_id, $price;
}
// ...
}

?>
up
9
gabe at fijiwebdesign dot com
9 years ago
Note that you can enable "overloading" on a class instance at runtime for an existing property by unset()ing that property.

eg:

<?php
class Test {

public
$property1;

public function
__get($name)
{
return
"Get called for " . get_class($this) . "->\$$name \n";
}

}
?>

The public property $property1 can be unset() so that it can be dynamically handled via __get().

<?php
$Test
= new Test();
unset(
$Test->property1); // enable overloading
echo $Test->property1; // Get called for Test->$property1
?>

Useful if you want to proxy or lazy load properties yet want to have documentation and visibility in the code and debugging compared to __get(), __isset(), __set() on non-existent inaccessible properties.
up
11
php at lanar dot com dot au
13 years ago
Note that __isset is not called on chained checks.
If isset( $x->a->b ) is executed where $x is a class with __isset() declared, __isset() is not called.

<?php

class demo
{
var
$id ;
function
__construct( $id = 'who knows' )
{
$this->id = $id ;
}
function
__get( $prop )
{
echo
"\n", __FILE__, ':', __LINE__, ' ', __METHOD__, '(', $prop, ') instance ', $this->id ;
return new
demo( 'autocreated' ) ; // return a class anyway for the demo
}
function
__isset( $prop )
{
echo
"\n", __FILE__, ':', __LINE__, ' ', __METHOD__, '(', $prop, ') instance ', $this->id ;
return
FALSE ;
}
}
$x = new demo( 'demo' ) ;
echo
"\n", 'Calls __isset() on demo as expected when executing isset( $x->a )' ;
$ret = isset( $x->a ) ;
echo
"\n", 'Calls __get() on demo without call to __isset() when executing isset( $x->a->b )' ;
$ret = isset( $x->a->b ) ;
?>

Outputs

Calls __isset() on demo as expected when executing isset( $x->a )
C:\htdocs\test.php:31 demo::__isset(a) instance demo
Calls __get() on demo without call to __isset() when executing isset( $x->a->b )
C:\htdocs\test.php:26 demo::__get(a) instance demo
C:\htdocs\test.php:31 demo::__isset(b) instance autocreated
up
9
PHP at jyopp dotKomm
18 years ago
Here's a useful class for logging function calls. It stores a sequence of calls and arguments which can then be applied to objects later. This can be used to script common sequences of operations, or to make "pluggable" operation sequences in header files that can be replayed on objects later.

If it is instantiated with an object to shadow, it behaves as a mediator and executes the calls on this object as they come in, passing back the values from the execution.

This is a very general implementation; it should be changed if error codes or exceptions need to be handled during the Replay process.
<?php
class MethodCallLog {
private
$callLog = array();
private
$object;

public function
__construct($object = null) {
$this->object = $object;
}
public function
__call($m, $a) {
$this->callLog[] = array($m, $a);
if (
$this->object) return call_user_func_array(array(&$this->object,$m),$a);
return
true;
}
public function
Replay(&$object) {
foreach (
$this->callLog as $c) {
call_user_func_array(array(&$object,$c[0]), $c[1]);
}
}
public function
GetEntries() {
$rVal = array();
foreach (
$this->callLog as $c) {
$rVal[] = "$c[0](".implode(', ', $c[1]).");";
}
return
$rVal;
}
public function
Clear() {
$this->callLog = array();
}
}

$log = new MethodCallLog();
$log->Method1();
$log->Method2("Value");
$log->Method1($a, $b, $c);
// Execute these method calls on a set of objects...
foreach ($array as $o) $log->Replay($o);
?>
up
2
johannes dot kingma at gmail dot com
2 years ago
One interesting use of the __get function is property / function colaescence, using the same name for a property and a function.

Example:
<?php
class prop_fun {
private
$prop = 123;

public function
__get( $property ) {
if(
property_exists( $this, $property ) ){
return
$this-> $property;
}
throw new
Exception( "no such property $property." );
}
public function
prop() {
return
456;
}
}

$o = new prop_fun();

echo
$o-> prop . '<br>' . PHP_EOL;
echo
$o-> prop() . '<br>' . PHP_EOL;
?>

This will output 123 and 456. This does look like a funy cludge but I used it of a class containing a date type property and function allowing me to write

<?php
class date_class {
/** @property int $date */
private $the_date;

public function
__get( $property ) {
if(
property_exists( $this, $property ) ){
return
$this-> $property;
}
throw new
Exception( "no such property $property." );
}
public function
the_date( $datetime ) {
return
strtotime( $datetime, $this-> the_date );
}

public function
__construct() {
$this-> the_date = time();
}
}

$date_object = new date_class();

$today = $date_object-> the_date;
$nextyear = $date_object-> the_date("+1 year");

echo
date( "d/m/Y", $today) . '<br>';
echo
date( "d/m/Y", $nextyear );
?>

Which I like because its self documenting properties. I used this in a utility class for user input.
up
4
cottton at i-stats dot net
9 years ago
Actually you dont need __set ect imo.
You could use it to set (pre-defined) protected (and in "some" cases private) properties . But who wants that?
(test it by uncommenting private or protected)
(pastebin because long ...) => http://pastebin.com/By4gHrt5
up
6
jstubbs at work-at dot co dot jp
17 years ago
<?php $myclass->foo['bar'] = 'baz'; ?>

When overriding __get and __set, the above code can work (as expected) but it depends on your __get implementation rather than your __set. In fact, __set is never called with the above code. It appears that PHP (at least as of 5.1) uses a reference to whatever was returned by __get. To be more verbose, the above code is essentially identical to:

<?php
$tmp_array
= &$myclass->foo;
$tmp_array['bar'] = 'baz';
unset(
$tmp_array);
?>

Therefore, the above won't do anything if your __get implementation resembles this:

<?php
function __get($name) {
return
array_key_exists($name, $this->values)
?
$this->values[$name] : null;
}
?>

You will actually need to set the value in __get and return that, as in the following code:

<?php
function __get($name) {
if (!
array_key_exists($name, $this->values))
$this->values[$name] = null;
return
$this->values[$name];
}
?>
up
4
justmyoponion at gmail dot com
4 years ago
If you are not focused enough, then don't use it.
Otherwise it is very powerful and you can build very complex code that handle a lot of things like zend framework did.
up
4
matthijs at yourmediafactory dot com
16 years ago
While PHP does not support true overloading natively, I have to disagree with those that state this can't be achieved trough __call.

Yes, it's not pretty but it is definately possible to overload a member based on the type of its argument. An example:
<?php
class A {

public function
__call ($member, $arguments) {
if(
is_object($arguments[0]))
$member = $member . 'Object';
if(
is_array($arguments[0]))
$member = $member . 'Array';
$this -> $member($arguments);
}

private function
testArray () {
echo
"Array.";
}

private function
testObject () {
echo
"Object.";
}
}

class
B {
}

$class = new A;
$class -> test(array()); // echo's 'Array.'
$class -> test(new B); // echo's 'Object.'
?>

Of course, the use of this is questionable (I have never needed it myself, but then again, I only have a very minimalistic C++ & JAVA background). However, using this general principle and optionally building forth on other suggestions a 'form' of overloading is definately possible, provided you have some strict naming conventions in your functions.

It would of course become a LOT easier once PHP'd let you declare the same member several times but with different arguments, since if you combine that with the reflection class 'real' overloading comes into the grasp of a good OO programmer. Lets keep our fingers crossed!
up
10
alexandre at nospam dot gaigalas dot net
16 years ago
PHP 5.2.1

Its possible to call magic methods with invalid names using variable method/property names:

<?php

class foo
{
function
__get($n)
{
print_r($n);
}
function
__call($m, $a)
{
print_r($m);
}
}

$test = new foo;
$varname = 'invalid,variable+name';
$test->$varname;
$test->$varname();

?>

I just don't know if it is a bug or a feature :)
up
4
timshaw at mail dot NOSPAMusa dot com
16 years ago
The __get overload method will be called on a declared public member of an object if that member has been unset.

<?php
class c {
public
$p ;
public function
__get($name) { return "__get of $name" ; }
}

$c = new c ;
echo
$c->p, "\n" ; // declared public member value is empty
$c->p = 5 ;
echo
$c->p, "\n" ; // declared public member value is 5
unset($c->p) ;
echo
$c->p, "\n" ; // after unset, value is "__get of p"
?>
up
3
Marius
18 years ago
for anyone who's thinking about traversing some variable tree
by using __get() and __set(). i tried to do this and found one
problem: you can handle couple of __get() in a row by returning
an object which can handle consequential __get(), but you can't
handle __get() and __set() that way.
i.e. if you want to:
<?php
print($obj->val1->val2->val3); // three __get() calls
?> - this will work,
but if you want to:
<?php
$obj
->val1->val2 = $val; // one __get() and one __set() call
?> - this will fail with message:
"Fatal error: Cannot access undefined property for object with
overloaded property access"
however if you don't mix __get() and __set() in one expression,
it will work:
<?php
$obj
->val1 = $val; // only one __set() call
$val2 = $obj->val1->val2; // two __get() calls
$val2->val3 = $val; // one __set() call
?>

as you can see you can split __get() and __set() parts of
expression into two expressions to make it work.

by the way, this seems like a bug to me, will have to report it.
up
4
daevid at daevid dot com
14 years ago
Here's a handy little routine to suggest properties you're trying to set that don't exist. For example:

Attempted to __get() non-existant property/variable 'operator_id' in class 'User'.

checking for operator and suggesting the following:

* id_operator
* operator_name
* operator_code

enjoy.

<?php
/**
* Suggests alternative properties should a __get() or __set() fail
*
* @param string $property
* @return string
* @author Daevid Vincent [daevid@daevid.com]
* @date 05/12/09
* @see __get(), __set(), __call()
*/
public function suggest_alternative($property)
{
$parts = explode('_',$property);
foreach(
$parts as $i => $p) if ($p == '_' || $p == 'id') unset($parts[$i]);

echo
'checking for <b>'.implode(', ',$parts)."</b> and suggesting the following:<br/>\n";

echo
"<ul>";
foreach(
$this as $key => $value)
foreach(
$parts as $p)
if (
stripos($key, $p) !== false) print '<li>'.$key."</li>\n";
echo
"</ul>";
}

just put it in your __get() or __set() like so:

public function
__get($property)
{
echo
"<p><font color='#ff0000'>Attempted to __get() non-existant property/variable '".$property."' in class '".$this->get_class_name()."'.</font><p>\n";
$this->suggest_alternative($property);
exit;
}
?>
up
4
Adeel Khan
16 years ago
Observe:

<?php
class Foo {
function
__call($m, $a) {
die(
$m);
}
}

$foo = new Foo;
print
$foo->{'wow!'}();

// outputs 'wow!'
?>

This method allows you to call functions with invalid characters.
up
4
Daniel Smith
12 years ago
Be careful of __call in case you have a protected/private method. Doing this:

<?php
class TestMagicCallMethod {
public function
foo()
{
echo
__METHOD__.PHP_EOL;
}

public function
__call($method, $args)
{
echo
__METHOD__.PHP_EOL;
if(
method_exists($this, $method))
{
$this->$method();
}
}

protected function
bar()
{
echo
__METHOD__.PHP_EOL;
}

private function
baz()
{
echo
__METHOD__.PHP_EOL;
}
}

$test = new TestMagicCallMethod();
$test->foo();
/**
* Outputs:
* TestMagicCallMethod::foo
*/

$test->bar();
/**
* Outputs:
* TestMagicCallMethod::__call
* TestMagicCallMethod::bar
*/

$test->baz();
/**
* Outputs:
* TestMagicCallMethod::__call
* TestMagicCallMethod::baz
*/
?>

..is probably not what you should be doing. Always make sure that the methods you call in __call are allowed as you probably dont want all the private/protected methods to be accessed by a typo or something.
up
2
Nanhe Kumar
10 years ago
<?php
//How can implement __call function you understand better
class Employee {

protected
$_name;
protected
$_email;
protected
$_compony;

public function
__call($name, $arguments) {
$action = substr($name, 0, 3);
switch (
$action) {
case
'get':
$property = '_' . strtolower(substr($name, 3));
if(
property_exists($this,$property)){
return
$this->{$property};
}else{
$trace = debug_backtrace();
trigger_error('Undefined property ' . $name . ' in ' . $trace[0]['file'] . ' on line ' . $trace[0]['line'], E_USER_NOTICE);
return
null;
}
break;
case
'set':
$property = '_' . strtolower(substr($name, 3));
if(
property_exists($this,$property)){
$this->{$property} = $arguments[0];
}else{
$trace = debug_backtrace();
trigger_error('Undefined property ' . $name . ' in ' . $trace[0]['file'] . ' on line ' . $trace[0]['line'], E_USER_NOTICE);
return
null;
}

break;
default :
return
FALSE;
}
}

}

$s = new Employee();
$s->setName('Nanhe Kumar');
$s->setEmail('nanhe.kumar@gmail.com');
echo
$s->getName(); //Nanhe Kumar
echo $s->getEmail(); // nanhe.kumar@gmail.com
$s->setAge(10); //Notice: Undefined property setAge in
?>
up
2
strata_ranger at hotmail dot com
14 years ago
Combining two things noted previously:

1 - Unsetting an object member removes it from the object completely, subsequent uses of that member will be handled by magic methods.
2 - PHP will not recursively call one magic method from within itself (at least for the same $name).

This means that if an object member has been unset(), it IS possible to re-declare that object member (as public) by creating it within your object's __set() method, like this:

<?php
class Foo
{
function
__set($name, $value)
{
// Add a new (public) member to this object.
// This works because __set() will not recursively call itself.
$this->$name= $value;
}
}

$foo = new Foo();

// $foo has zero members at this point
var_dump($foo);

// __set() will be called here
$foo->bar = 'something'; // Calls __set()

// $foo now contains one member
var_dump($foo);

// Won't call __set() because 'bar' is now declared
$foo->bar = 'other thing';

?>

Also be mindful that if you want to break a reference involving an object member without triggering magic functionality, DO NOT unset() the object member directly. Instead use =& to bind the object member to any convenient null variable.
up
2
DevilDude at darkmaker dot com
19 years ago
Php 5 has a simple recursion system that stops you from using overloading within an overloading function, this means you cannot get an overloaded variable within the __get method, or within any functions/methods called by the _get method, you can however call __get manualy within itself to do the same thing.
up
1
dans at dansheps dot com
12 years ago
Since this was getting me for a little bit, I figure I better pipe in here...

For nested calls to private/protected variables(probably functions too) what it does is call a __get() on the first object, and if you return the nested object, it then calls a __get() on the nested object because, well it is protected as well.

EG:
<?php
class A
{
protected
$B

public function __construct()
{
$this->B = new B();
}

public function
__get($variable)
{
echo
"Class A::Variable " . $variable . "\n\r";
$retval = $this->{$variable};
return
$retval;
}
}

class
B
{
protected
$val

public function __construct()
{
$this->val = 1;
}

public function
__get($variable)
{
echo
"Class B::Variable " . $variable . "\n\r";
$retval = $this->{$variable};
return
$retval;
}
}

$A = new A();

echo
"Final Value: " . $A->B->val;
?>

That will return something like...

Class A::Variable B
Class B::Variable val
Final Value: 1

It seperates the calls into $A->B and $B->val

Hope this helps someone
up
0
php at sleep is the enemy dot co dot uk
16 years ago
Just to reinforce and elaborate on what DevilDude at darkmaker dot com said way down there on 22-Sep-2004 07:57.

The recursion detection feature can prove especially perilous when using __set. When PHP comes across a statement that would usually call __set but would lead to recursion, rather than firing off a warning or simply not executing the statement it will act as though there is no __set method defined at all. The default behaviour in this instance is to dynamically add the specified property to the object thus breaking the desired functionality of all further calls to __set or __get for that property.

Example:

<?php

class TestClass{

public
$values = array();

public function
__get($name){
return
$this->values[$name];
}

public function
__set($name, $value){
$this->values[$name] = $value;
$this->validate($name);
}

public function
validate($name){
/*
__get will be called on the following line
but as soon as we attempt to call __set
again PHP will refuse and simply add a
property called $name to $this
*/
$this->$name = trim($this->$name);
}
}

$tc = new TestClass();

$tc->foo = 'bar';
$tc->values['foo'] = 'boing';

echo
'$tc->foo == ' . $tc->foo . '<br>';
echo
'$tc ' . (property_exists($tc, 'foo') ? 'now has' : 'still does not have') . ' a property called "foo"<br>';

/*
OUPUTS:
$tc->foo == bar
$tc now has a property called "foo"
*/

?>
To Top